In
[1, p. 34 exercise 2.12] we are asked to verify the equations given for the Cholesky decomposition,
[1, (2.53)-(2.55)]. Furthermore it is requested to use these equations to find the inverse of the matrix given in problem
[1, 2.7].
Solution:
The Cholesky decomposition provides a numeric approach for solving linear equations

. First the matrix

is decomposed
as a matrix product

, where

is a lower triangular matrix with the elements on the main diagonal beeing ones

, and

a diagonal matrix. In order to verify
[1, (2.53)] we set

or
which is written analytically as:
In order to obtain the solution for the vector

the previous set of equations can be rewritten as
The last equations verify
[1, (2.53)]. We had previously set

from which we can derive
the equation

. Again expanding the previous compact matrix notation the following set of equations can be obtained:
The solution for the vector

can be found by rewriting the previous set of equations:
The set of equations (
2,
3) verify
[1, (2.54)]. Equation
[1, (2.55)] has still to be verified. This equation provides the algorithm to decompose the matrix

. Let
![\mathbf{L}=[l_{ij}]](https://lysario.de/wp-content/cache/tex_438a67ce1c3c41c2f40f2f5c6d46ec6e.png)
with
Thus
Furthermore let
![\mathbf{D}=[d_{ij}]](https://lysario.de/wp-content/cache/tex_f8de7c8a00fbe8abeae4be76ac36c583.png)
with
The elements of the matrix product

are given by
and the elements

of

are obtained by

(because

for

).
When the elements

are replaced by the corresponding sum (
8) then the elements

can be further expanded to:

. But

, for

and thus:
The last equation (
9) is a consequence of the fact that

. A recursive formula for

can be derived when

:
Equation (
10) can be identified as the second part of the relation
[1, (2.55)]. The first part is obtained by simply setting

. In this case the second summand degenerates and the relation can be written as:

.
From (
9) by setting

the following relation emerges:
and again for

the second summand degenerates and we obtain the relation

.
In order to find the inverse of the real matrix given in problem
[1, 2.7]:
we can compute the solutions

by (
2,
3) for which

,

beeing the

vector of the standard base ,

. The inverse matrix will then be
![\mathbf{R}=\left[\mathbf{r}_1 \; \mathbf{r}_2 \; \mathbf{r}_3 \right]](https://lysario.de/wp-content/cache/tex_501bf87d2cc82edd44f9db5fef79ec79.png)
The Cholesky decomposition of the matrix

is obtained by:
By equation (
2) we obtain for

:
and thus by (
3):
For

using the formula (
2):
and thus by (
3):
Finally for

using again the formula (
2):
and thus by (
3):
Thus the inverse of the matrix

is given by
, which is exactly the solution that was obtained in
[2] for problem
[1, 2.7].
[1] Steven M. Kay: “Modern Spectral Estimation – Theory and Applications”, Prentice Hall, ISBN: 0-13-598582-X. [2] Panagiotis Chatzichrisafis: “Solution of exercise 2.7 from Kay’s Modern Spectral Estimation -
Theory and Applications”, lysario.de.
One Response for "Steven M. Kay: “Modern Spectral Estimation – Theory and Applications”,p. 34 exercise 2.12"
[...] matrix , assuming are the elements of the matrix , are given by [1, p.30, (2.55)] (see also [3, relations (10) and (11) ]): and the elements of the matrix are given by the relation: The corresponding [...]
Leave a reply